Morality and Waste

Have you noticed the discourse about waste, recently? Yesterday, I read an article in the London Review of Books about morality. The author, Thomas Nagel, discussed 2 types: consequentialism (concerned with good/bad outcomes of our actions – utilitarianism is a popular version – and proponents take a rationalist perspective that we can always work outContinue reading “Morality and Waste”

Epistemic Injustice 2

As an evidence reviewer, I suspect that my work commits epistemic injustice in that it privileges the information needs of doctors and other professional classes, bringing together information that is narrowly scientifically valid. Thus it reinforces the divide between the lived experience of illness and misfortune, and the scientific codes that make up acceptable evidence.Continue reading “Epistemic Injustice 2”